201704.05
0

Abu-Khadier v. City of Ft. Myers

214 So. 3d 789 (Fla. 2d DCA 2017). The Firm persuaded the court to reverse a summary judgment denying a property owner compensation for closure of a grocery store. http://www.2dca.org/opinions/Opinion_Pages/Opinion_Pages_2017/April/April%2005,%202017/2D16-755.pdf

201702.24
0

Boardwalk at Daytona Development, LLC v. Paspalakis

212 So. 3d 1063 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). After the Fifth District issued its opinion in this matter in which the Firm’s client prevailed, the Appellee (Paspalakis) moved for rehearing. The Court then denied the motion with a written opinion, calling the motion “inappropriate and meritless.” http://www.5dca.org/Opinions/Opin2017/022017/5D15-1944.reh.op.pdf

201611.18
0

Boardwalk at Daytona Development, LLC v. Paspalakis

220 So. 3d 457 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017). In this significant property rights case, the Firm successfully reversed a decision of the trial court which granted specific performance to the Appellee, and ordered that a significant piece of commercial beach-front property be transferred by the Appellant. The case was the subject of extensive news coverage through the…

201404.30
0

St. Johns River Water Management District v. Koontz

2014 WL 1703942 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014) In the fifth appeal in this matter to the Fifth District, the appellate court affirmed the case after it was remanded from the United States Supreme Court (see Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District, 133 S.Ct. 2586 (2013)) to the Supreme Court of Florida, and ultimately…

201306.25
0

Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District

133 S. Ct. 2586 (2013) On the second to last day of the October 2012 term, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in this important property rights case. Attorney Chris Carlyle, along with trial counsel Michael D. Jones and the Pacific Legal Foundation, successfully persuaded the Court that the Nollan and Dolan standards…

200805.23
0

Davis v. Ivey

984 So. 2d 571 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) The Firm appealed a denial of a specific performance claim in a real estate transaction. In the Opinion, the Court reversed the trial court’s decision and ordered that the contract be specifically performed in our clients’ favor.